ZWRv2 Top 20 Amiibo Trainers

First topic message reminder :



● Tournament data was collected from July 8th - September 30th

● Tournaments are now being ranked by:

- Amount of entrants, every five trainers that enter = 1 point
- Amount of top 10 trainers, every top 10 trainer that enters = 1 point
- Amount of top 20 trainers, every top 20 trainer that enters = 0.5 point
- Amount of prizes, one prize = 3 points

After all of the points are added, they get multiplied by 100 to get their ranking.

Here are the tournaments that were ranked throughout the season + every trainer's rankings:
 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jF6qoGpxNcvBUM1E4c2ff3PeIz6sSxAYrljLZ0cCfrA/edit?usp=sharing

● Also here are the points needed for an amiibo tournament to be ranked: 

- D tier (lowest ranking for an amiibo tournament) if a tournament has an overall score below 300 points then it is ranked D tier.
  no points are given in these tournaments, only wins and losses are recorded.

- C tier (low ranking amiibo tournament) if a tournament has an overall score of 300-599 points then it is ranked C tier.
  trainers that place 5th-1st are given points: 5th-1 point, 4th-2 points, 3rd-3 points, 2nd-4 points, 1st-5 points.  wins and losses are recorded.

- B tier (moderate ranking amiibo tournament) if a tournament has an overall score of 600-999 points then it is ranked B tier.
  trainers that place 5th-1st are given points: 5th-30 points, 4th-40 points, 3rd-50 points, 2nd-60 points, 1st-70 points.  wins and losses are recorded.

- A tier (high ranking amiibo tournament) if a tournament has an overall score of 1000-1999 points then it is ranked A tier.
trainers that place 5th-1st are given points: 5th-80 points, 4th-90 points, 3rd-100 points, 2nd-110 points, 1st-120 points.  wins and losses are recorded.

- S tier (highest ranking amiibo tournament) if a tournament has an overall score of 2000 or above then it is ranked S tier.
trainers that place 5th-1st are given points: 5th-160 points, 4th-170 points, 3rd-180 points, 2nd-190 points, 1st-200 points.  wins and losses are recorded.

● Also, the six biggest amiibo tournaments that happened throughout the season had their points doubled.

● The XFactor on the player cards is subjective data, that was created by the panel through a survey.  It's the panelist opinions on where amiibo trainers should be ranked.  ex. Blakers has an xfactor of -2 meaning the combined opinions of the panelist thought he should be ranked at #3.

● Another thing is that trainers receive two separate scores: one for their tournament placings and another for wins and losses.  After their scores are finalized, the average of these two scores becomes a trainers overall score, which determines each trainers ranking.


Ok now let's take a look at the top 20 amiibo trainers!









 
 
          

The -14 X-Factor hurts. Ow.

And Zeno, were the top 10/top 20 win/losses counted into overall score?

Nope

ZeNo wrote:Out of the 16 tournaments you entered this quarter, you only placed well at 5 tournaments and stevofrags placed 2nd at lame 1 which was one of the six biggest tournaments which helped boost his score

Is it fair to say someone is one of the best because one tourney?

It seems you forgot to add the results of a few SATs this season.
http://challonge.com/1jw5q4b5
http://challonge.com/SAT_S2
http://challonge.com/SAT_D2
http://challonge.com/afr294up

No I don't think so, I'll fix that in the next power ranking

Whoops k I'll add those soon

Is there a particular reason LAME#3 RR isn't counted? Roster rounds are a better test of skill to be fair.

Well I didn't want to count it because whoever won that would have got a huge boost in their score because of all the wins.

Here's what I suggest for next season.

-Pick a list of tournament series. Those are all 'sanctioned' events, and count towards the PR. Anything else doesn't, and all tournaments in those series count.
-Maybe explain that the top 20/10 MUs didn't count towards the score?
-Take number of tournaments entered into account. Normal PRs tend to exclude people who did well, but entered too few to be considered.

And just more of a personal thing, maybe change up the X-Factor? Like the -14 hurts, but if I just saw a '7.9' or something there it might not have. Maybe just add up all the results and find the mean, put that there?

OK sure I'll do that next season, thanks